The Oslo forum 2004 focused on gaps in knowledge, capacity and commitment in the international community's response to armed conflict. Are policies well informed or are they shaped by assumptions and prejudice? Is the international community committed enough - both politically as well as financially - to critically monitor and adapt our strategies until a conflict is truly resolved? How best to engage with conflict parties, including armed groups? How to monitor and verify progress? What risks and opportunities does an emerging international criminal jurisdiction hold for conflict mediation? Some 20 participants debated these questions looking at practical ways in which existing gaps could be addressed.
The International Criminal Court and Conflict Mediation
by Paul Seils and Marieke Wierda
Trends in Conflict 2010 - 2030
by Prof Paul Rogers
Ceasefire Monitoring and Verification: Identifying Best Practice
by Antonia Potter
Asymmetric Mediation: Armed Groups and Peace Processes
by David Petrasek
The views expressed in papers posted on this website are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the HD Centre.